Computing’s 30-year itch
THIS COLUMN ORIGINALLY APPEARED IN MacUser Magazine 18th March 2011
30 year itch
Apple has put the word revolutionary in nearly every press release it has sent out in the past ten or so years. The Dalmatian iMac was revolutionary, the iPod was revolutionary the iPod sock was revolutionary; every version of iLife has been revolutionary. Which is funny because just about the only things all those technologies have in common is the fact that they’re not very revolutionary.
During the war (that’ll be World War II to give it its full official title) the US military were doing sums on how to kill as many people as possible with as much accuracy as possible by hand and with mechanical adding machines. Imagine how many more people they’d be able to kill if they had some sort of electronic calculating machine thought some bright spark and ENIAC (Electronic Numerical Integrator And Computer) was born.
Like all good military projects that involve computers ENIAC was delivered a bit late: 1946 to be precise. Still, the impact was unprecedented. Overnight the world changed and at first nobody could tell – ENIAC brought a jump in computing power so significant that today it would be akin to upgrading from an original Mac to a Mac Pro with 32GB of RAM. Boom as Steve Jobs might say. Soon, however, people realised what this new device could offer, clones and similar machines were made and did everything from calculating missile tables to managing the payroll and stock control of the J Lyons and Co. empire.
Then for 30 years or so that’s the way things were; computers got faster and more reliable, they got ever more powerful and more useful and they took up a lot of space. Then Steve Jobs met Steve Wozniak and that was the end of that. Well, the story is a touch more complicated in reality, but there isn’t space here to go into it fully.
Where the Apple I was geek cool the Apple II revolutionised computing, it cut the room-sized computer down to size and made it mainstream accessible. It’s hard to express quite what an impact the Apple II had. Computers were no more just for the army and large enterprise, mere mortals could use them to do stuff like spreadsheets, word processing and, as it turns out, kill many, many people – digital people in games at least.
Of course, many people see the 1984 Mac as a revolutionary product too, but was it as seismic a shift as ENIAC and Apple II? Probably not. As hard as it might be for Steve Jobs to swallow, the Mac was just a natural progression. The computer was still personal even with its fancy new WIMP acronym. It wasn’t as revolutionary as the Apple II or ENIAC. Insanely great? Perhaps, but world changing? Not so much. The Mac didn’t turn an industry on its head as much as it made existing hardware easier to use.
And so here we are, roughly thirty years since the Apple II and 60 odd years since ENIAC. What if we’re looking at the iPad and comparing it to the wrong era? Instead of looking at how the iPad compares to the laptop, netbook or iMac, perhaps it’s bigger than that. Where the ENIAC brought powerful computing into big business and the Apple II brought it to the home what if the iPad is bringing computing to some other as yet undefined place?
Perhaps the iPad is the ENIAC or Apple II of its day and we just can’t see it yet. Blinded by 30 years of ‘the industry standard’ just as IBM and others were when the Apple II launched. No doubt that some of the good men and women of the 1950s, 60s and 70s super computer generation looked at the Apple II and asked: But what’s it for? It’s a question I’ve heard in reference to the iPad from more than one or two of the 1980s, 90s and 00s PC generation recently.
We can’t possibly know if the iPad will prove to be that revolutionary step right now because we’re living in the past most of the time. Perhaps the iPad is just a fad, but maybe Apple has just kick-started its second and the worlds third computing revolution. The iPad might just be a post-PC device after all – truly revolutionary.

I’m voting yes to AV in May.
My reasons are very simple, but having read about the two systems I feel that AV makes enough of a change to *my* style of politics to be worthwhile.
I very rarely go into a poling booth with a strong political conviction. I vote based on who I like the most (as, I suppose everyone does), but never do I agree 100% with everything they do or plan to do. The AV system allows me to vote how I want. I don’t care if that doesn’t make a difference to the outcome. It’s my vote.
It’s unlikely that my constituency of Halifax will shift away from Labour, but that’s not important to me. What I want is for my vote to be counted. For me it’s not about winning or voting for the winner it’s about registering my preference. And my preference often falls betwixt and between two parties. I’m a bit socialist on some counts and a bit conservative on the other. As well as that the AV system still enables people who are staunchly one way or another to continue to vote that way. Only want Labour? Just put a tick next to that box. Suits me and you.
I also like the way AV seems more appropriately grown-up. With FPTP my vote is counted once for my chosen candidate and is, essentially, a no for all the others. WIth AV my vote can mean ‘these first, them second, but definitely not those’. This more closely matches my actual feelings for nearly every vote I’ve ever cast.
AV won’t change the world and it’s not inherently ‘better’ than FPtP, I understand that, but as I see it it improves the overall balance of my vote. Your mileage may vary.
Why fire drills are a good thing
When I worked at Jessops we had to do these mundane ballache fire drills every so often. They were a pain – everything had to stop and everyone had to leave.
If you were on a break, tough. Selling a million pounds worth of kit to a customer? Never mind. GET OUT AND LOCK THE DOORS BEHIND YOU. It was never a fire, but on two occasions it was a bomb. Leeds was rarely a target, but like most big towns there were the occasional ‘scares’. It was after these two experiences that I became much less worried about the ballache of the fire drills as they proved their worth.
Retail staff are trained to be subservient to customers. Different companies have different approaches, but number one is normally be polite and represent the company and remember that when they are shouting and swearing at you that it’s the company they are taking it out on not you. This breeds a culture where staff (especially junior ones) find it hard to stand up to customers.
Some staff don’t take any shit some do, nothing is certain, but on rare occasions staff need to be told that they HAVE to do certain things and regardless of ‘the customer service charter’ the customer is very clearly wrong and can be told so. Fire/emergencies are one such occasion.
On my first Leeds bomb scare I was serving a customer when the fire alarm went off. I didn’t stop, I didn’t need to check a manual, I didn’t have to ask the manager what to do. I told the customer he’d have to leave now and escorted him to the door. We left the shop and went to sit outside the art gallery for an hour or so before the suspect package was ‘investigated*’ by one of those robots. *blown to shit in an explosion we could see and hear.
The second Leeds bomb scare was much the same, except my customer refused to leave. Now, in normal circumstances it’s be the other way around and I’d be begging the customer to stay, but this guy REALLY wanted to buy his Billingham Lens Pouch. I knew that serving him wasn’t an option, the alarm was going off and I was leaving. I basically had to tell him to get lost. ‘it’s just a drill’ was his response. ‘I don’t care what it is’ I said ‘please leave NOW’ He walked out the door promising to write a letter of complaint, which he duly did. The health and safety manager replied to him and CCd me in. Basically it said (paraphrasing)’piss off you doddery old twatbag Chris did EXACTLY what he was trained to do’
To you it might not seem like a big thing, but I think it’s massively important. Why can’t people just use their common sense?
BECAUE SOMETIMES THEY DON’T.
In my example, there was a police cordon about 200 police officers and 2 miles of blue ‘do not cross tape’ and the guy who I had to eject asked the policeman nearest our shop what time ‘this nonsense would all be over’
It was a real bomb. Happily, it didn’t go off.
Obviously, my experience is slightly different because they were bombs and not fires, but it illustrates the point that without proper guidance a situation can go wobbly. If I’d let the guy stay and buy his bag we were all in danger for longer.
People at the Woolworths fire in Manchester refused to leave because they had just bought dinner. I’ve seen the same in Costa at the White Rose Centre in Leeds the difference was that the manager and all the staff of Costa knew what to do and that was get everyone out and worry about customer service later. 10 people died in the fire in Manchester and though there were plenty of other reasons why the death toll was so high removing one of the reasons is surely in everyone’s best interests.
‘The boy who cried wolf’ is a good counter argument I suppose. Too many fire drills and people stop believing it’s real. But, how many people don’t leave? How many people don’t know what to do? Very few. Yeah, everyone might bitch like a cowbag on their way to the exit BUT THEY ARE LEAVING. People copy what is going on around them. In Woolworths I’m sure the first person who refused to leave compounded the problem as others followed suit. Another thing, they are leaving calmly and in a coordinated fashion. If you don’t find out until you are well out of harms way that there IS a fire then there’s less panic too.
The best bit of advice I ever got was from the Jessops fire marshall and it applies wherever you might have to do a fire drill:
‘you don’t know 100% why the alarm is going off unless you tripped it. GET. OUT.’
Things that freak me out a little when I notice them #28 in a series of 479
I can work and listen to music, but only if I wear headphones. Take the headphones off and I lose focus and stop working.
Weirrrd.
WAAHmbulance Chaser
Someone who signs up to free services and complains bitterly when that free service is changed or restricted in ANY way.
Someone who buys a product and then complains bitterly that company has the audacity to release an chargeable update.
Someone who likes paying nothing and expecting a level of service normally set aside for presidents and heads of state.
Someone who uses the free or ‘lite’ version but complains bitterly that the paid for version has more features.
If a tablet isn’t a PC
then what is it? How is a tablet, like say, the iPad not a PC?
…as shoppers resisted low prices on PCs or switched to buying tablet devices.
Read more: PC sales slip for first time in two years | News | PC Pro http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/366772/pc-sales-slip-for-first-time-in-two-years#ixzz1JU9ttCbs





