Back in 2003 Paul Thurrott wrote about Apple vs. Microsoft and without knowing it encapsulated almost perfectly what has made Apple successful and what has dragged Microsoft down: Letting others control your agenda, products and focus.
Apple v Microsoft (continued page 1,000,094)
Wininfo’s Paul Thurrott, who went to both last week’s shows, sums up at the end of today’s newsletter: “Because Jobs gave his Macworld address just days before Microsoft Chairman and Chief Software Architect Bill Gates presented his 2003 International Computer Electronics Show (CES) keynote address, not comparing the two events is impossible. The most obvious difference is support: Apple appears to be interested in going it alone, even to the extent of creating applications that don’t break new ground or introduce new product categories but instead compete with existing third-party applications. Meanwhile, Gates’s address continually touted Microsoft’s many industry partners, such as the hardware makers working on Media2Go and Smart Personal Object Technology (SPOT) devices, Media Center PCs, and Tablet PCs. All of Microsoft’s initiatives appear to be collaborative efforts, whereas Apple is basically circling the wagons and seizing any lucrative (and in the case of Safari, nonlucrative) businesses for itself. Put simply, comparing the reality of these two companies with way the public perceives them is astonishing.”
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2003/jan/13/applevmicroso
And let’s be clear here when I say dragged Microsoft down I don’t mean to their knees I mean a few hundred feet down the mountain. Sill, there’s further to fall the higher up you go.
